|
||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
Editor's Call ARTICLES Commons Park River Rally South Park Ranch Seeking Volunteers Workshops for 2005 FEATURES Legal Developments Research Summaries Volume 15, Number 4 Winter 2004 Volume 15, Number 3 Fall 2004 Volume 15, Number 2 Summer 2004 Volume 15, Number 1 Spring 2004 Volume 14, Number 3 Fall/Winter 2003 Volume 14, Number 2 Summer 2003 Volume 14, Number 1 Spring 2003 Volume 13, Number 3, Fall 2002 PREVIOUS ISSUES |
Legal Developmentsby Larry MacDonnellColorado Water Ranch owners proposed a project that would pump 140,000 acre-feet of groundwater per year using 26 wells located on its property in South Park for delivery to Aurora. Surface water would be stored in the cone of depression created by the pumping and would serve to replace out-of-priority depletions to avoid injury to existing water users. The Supreme Court supported the trial court's determination that project proponents had failed to provide sufficient evidence relating to replacement of depletions to support its application. Nebraska Water Spear T, a surface water appropriator from Pumpkin Creek, filed a complaint against upstream groundwater pumpers, asserting they were converting his rights to their use without compensation or otherwise harming his legally protected rights. The Nebraska Supreme Court adopted the approach set forth in Section 858 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts recognizing liability for withdrawal of groundwater that has a direct and substantial effect unreasonably causing harm to another entitled to use water. The Court then allowed Spear T to amend its complaint in accordance with this standard. Endangered Species Act A federal district court in Oregon has rejected the FWS's final rule creating three Distinct Population Segments (DPS) for the gray wolf and downlisting the wolf's status from endangered to threatened in two of the segments. The court found the FWS had failed to adequately explain its conclusion that the wolf was no longer in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range, as required under the ESA. It also held that the DPS had not been properly established. The effect of the court's decision to vacate the rule is to leave the wolf in its present endangered status wherever it might be found. Section 404 of the Clean Water Act | |||||||||||
| Posted on December 24, 2004. |